Denied Best Posts in Thread: Banned For Sexual Reference

Eh, I'll take whatever warning points I get for this. There are a few major issues at heart here.

1)

This is not equating intention of sexuality to action. This is far from enough evidence to even begin suggesting sexual connotation. You should not have used that statement to defend the ban, it puts you in a bad spot.

2) Those two screenshots are pure rubbish. They show nothing except a text chat, so any argument you have chosen to further that defense based on the screenshots are moot. You cannot tell WHO is in that picture, just a guy in a skin with enchanted diamond armor. You could have easily moved the mouse just a tad bit up and caught the correct information needed to support the argument the person in the picture was HotAsianBeans, you didn't. You lost that one.

3) The kicker in this case, is the chat is sexual, at least sexual enough to supercede any doubts raised by either statement or individual screenshotted. The chat alone would warrant the ban, and arguments towards "That is not what I meant", and etc is a stupid defense by someone trying to get through a loophole. The ban should stay for this reason.

However, more concerning is the precendent this sets. Is shift-clicking inherently sexual without the text addition? If shifting and unshifting next to someone ban worthy? Can it be linked to sexual connotations without additional evidence of intent? I firmly believe that this case has not been made clear enough to set precedent in rules/laws. From the argument of the mod, the issue was with the shifting, not the text.