No, because my opinion is solely based on prior experience with him as it is on all staff applications I respond to. The only time I read them is if I don't know the person well. Gummi has had a long history of immaturity and I just don't see him as fit for staff.
For the times I'm on he's usually there. You intrigued me to read it so I did. I found that while his "why" section had some okay points, his introduction and his weaknesses were essentially filler. Grammar is not an important weakness, neither is lack of commands, since that's what you learn on the job. (1/3?)
Now his why section was okay and if I had no prior experience with him, it would probably merit a +1 or at the very least a neutral vote. Unfortunately, I've seen him at some of his worse times and that is conduct that I find unfit for staff. I -1'd him not because of anything he said or didn't say in his application, but because of who I thought he would be as a worker. (2/3)
The application is to inform people, you don't need to inform people who have already formed an opinion of you. I would've written this all down in my reply, but it's 1:45, and I really can't be bothered to. Simply, I don't think he's fit, regardless of what his application said (and at this point in time, I have read it, yes). (3/3)
I would just advise you pay attention to him in game without him knowing. If he doesn't change a bit, I would like to know. I don't get in game very much anymore so my vote is pretty much solely based on the application. My fear is that people won't forget the past even if he REALlly, REALLy changes. You know what I mean?
Comments on Profile Post by Darke_Amethyst