Optional Donation Ranks (Optional Perks)

I think this is a great idea. Instead of donating lots of money but the commands you don't exactly like (for example).

You can choose your own perks, with the tag being [Donator] or something like that.
Each perk can be $10 each. (Except: Spawner Mining $30, /fly $60) and when you donate you can choose what perks you want.
For example, if I was a citizen, and Donated $50, I could choose
Spawner Mining ($30), /fix ($10) and /disguise ($10). But these are the only perks you get for $50. I actually think this could be worth it, although I only got 3 perks, I chose 3 of my favorite ones and I'd be happy about that.
For /home, you donate $1 for every home you can have, so if you want 20 homes, you must donate $20.

How is this idea?

 

Its a good idea but Ultimate maybe need to pay more? that 320 USD now

 

Ultimate has well over 30+ perks, so Ultimates worth more than the optional rank.
If you come to think of it, 3 perks for $50, doesnt sound much, but spawner mining, /disguise, /fix, there's loads, every single perk is $10 but you have the power to decide what specific perks you'd like.

--- Double Post Merged, May 6, 2015, Original Post Date: May 6, 2015 ---

If you're an ultimate, this won't work. If you're exclusive for example, you'd buy spawner mining and probably a couple of eggs, but i'm not sure how that would work.

UPDATE: Custom Colored chat for $50

 

I dont really see this is a good idea...It just feels like something negative or bad would happen if this was a thing.

 

Its sounds like good but think on it. Now can citizen maybe get mining for 30 when it usally 80 you need to pay soem bought elites just for spawners they lose 50 USD

 

Most elites could care less about spawners, its all about that /fix.

 

They still much money

 

-1. what about the people who already donated? would they be forced to pay for perks that they already have?

 

^ plus think of it this way, How would you know who owns what? like a cit with fly could say they own spawner mining but don't making it illegal for you to give them the spawner. Ima go with -1 for now until some more suggestions come out for it.

 

I agree. -1

 

I can alrerady smell the server riots... -24

 

I'm glad this generation can make sentences that make sense...

This is, while maybe good in theory, could easily be abused and become unfair, plus the rule breakings like

would happen a LOT more often.
-1.

 

Oops it should be ''It still much money losed''

 

I'm going to come out and say this is denied; the posts above show how it isn't a very well thought out idea and wouldn't work in the long run.