Denied Forum Ban Appeal

This is on behalf of fangdragon as she is locked out. She wrote all this.
IGN (In-Game Name): Forum ban - fangdragon1998
Date/Time: 4/30/2014 (4/1/2014 in some times)
Reason: Warning points
Ban Length: 3 days
Staff Member: Abbythrowstuff was the last warning
Why we should consider your appeal: As told to me by a staff member, warnings should only last 2 weeks. 2 warning points should have expired by now, on april 23rd to be exact. I request to be unbanned. I won't argue over the EDIT: reasons for warnings at the moment.
Thank you to whoever replies.

 

http://gyazo.com/bcefdd97bb6b4745938626f8457854d7
Here is the warning points expiration dates for reference. They don't expire until mid may.

 

Could you please include actual evidence possibly?
I see no reason for the points,
no original point assignment dates,
no point endurances.
Also, the top is labeled "Expiry"
I seriously doubt the validity of this.
Also, there is no way to positively identify who these points are for.

I see no name, and no previously stated evidence.
It did not help anyone in terms of coming to a conclusion.

Please refrain from posting unrelated comments on Ban Appeals.
Thank you.

--- Double Post Merged, Apr 30, 2014, Original Post Date: Apr 30, 2014 ---

Now, Fang says:
From mod via skype.
Posting unrelated content on player reports Today at 4:47 PM 1 May 30, 2014 at 4:47 PM View
Posting unrelated content on player reports Today at 4:45 PM 1 May 30, 2014 at 4:45 PM View
Posting unrelated content on ban appeals Apr 23, 2014 1 May 23, 2014 at 12:13 PM View
Non-constructive application comments Apr 15, 2014 1 May 15, 2014 at 3:27 AM View

Start times are first, end times second.
As you can see these were all for a month. According to a different mod, they should have been for 2 weeks - thus, expired.
Seeing as you have given me three of those, mind getting another opinion?

 

A while ago, expiry dates where changed to one month so that we no longer have to manually change them to two weeks. This allowed us to give warning points more efficiently. Correspondingly, the bans require more warning points.

I looked into every warning point myself, and they are all definitely warranted.

 

Moving to denied, I worked this all out with Fang over Skype.