Co-mayors And Recruiters

KariStar86

Co-mayors shouldn't be able to add or remove other co-mayors... they are now, and that could get problematic, haha.

JaMiiE_Londors

Co-mayors shouldn't be able to add or remove other co-mayors... they are now, and that could get problematic, haha.
~ @KariStar86

Not if they are trusted people

KariStar86

Not if they are trusted people
~ @JaMiiE_Londors

Wait... can co-mayors name a mayor?

JaMiiE_Londors

Wait... can co-mayors name a mayor?
~ @KariStar86

Nope, don't think so

Khafra

Terraformer
Able to /t claim and terraform land like plots.

Angelofdeath324

Builder: can build and destroy anywhere in the town. Great for plot clearers

blackoak999

I think Co-Mayor and Head-Assistant is good. I've heard Real Estate Agent, why would you need that? you can already claim plots and unclaim.
~ @JaMiiE_Londors

Assistants can't /t unclaim

Skaros123

I see a lot of complaints about co-mayor having /t withdraw. Honestly, it's not a bad thing... There's a very very very simple solution here. DON'T GIVE PEOPLE CO-MAYOR IF THEY ARE NOT TRUSTABLE!

Erebus45

I see a lot of complaints about co-mayor having /t withdraw. Honestly, it's not a bad thing... There's a very very very simple solution here. DON'T GIVE PEOPLE CO-MAYOR IF THEY ARE NOT TRUSTABLE!
~ @Skaros123

But that would make things too easy

SirCallow

This is staff:

Nuff said. I like current ranks btw.

KariStar86

I see a lot of complaints about co-mayor having /t withdraw. Honestly, it's not a bad thing... There's a very very very simple solution here. DON'T GIVE PEOPLE CO-MAYOR IF THEY ARE NOT TRUSTABLE!
~ @Skaros123

I agree, but this part bugs me - what's the logic in not giving co-mayors /t delete, then? Both can effectively do the same thing, especially if towny taxes actually line up with towny time.

Skaros123

I agree, but this part bugs me - what's the logic in not giving co-mayors /t delete, then? Both can effectively do the same thing, especially if towny taxes actually line up with towny time.
~ @KariStar86

Well, the thing about /t delete is that co-mayors aren't actually the "owner" of a town. It seems silly to give them the option to delete someone else's property, even if you trust the person.

Deinen

I agree, but this part bugs me - what's the logic in not giving co-mayors /t delete, then? Both can effectively do the same thing, especially if towny taxes actually line up with towny time.
~ @KariStar86

For the record, I would trust both my co-mayors with /t delete. However the difference is, with /t withdraw, it's like having someone work around the nuke, and could indirectly launch it. But if you give them /t delete, it's like just giving them the launch key. Only a set number of people need /t delete because regardless of trust there should be only a set number of people to ever use it. Leaving it out isn't an issue of trust, but an issue of liability.

Aside from that, /t withdraw has a number of practical uses. Projects and work would slow to a crawl if everyone needed to wait for me to pull money out and/or pay for things. Now I can have a few people I trust, in this case founded Lakewood with me, pull that money out, and we have 2 more funding spigots for projects. /t delete has no practical usage outside of devastation, that command doesn't assist anything that would reasonably need assistance on.

You must trust your staff, and if they mess up, it's your fault. If people vetted who they gave assistant to, etc, there would also be less overall cases of mayoral/assistant abuse, theft, etc. Meaning outside this example itself, this system of trusting/knowing/vetting your staff first would bring improvements to a lot more things than an individual town.

Also to note, just because a co-mayor can withdraw, doesn't mean the money is his in any way as well. Legally, the town is owned by , and all bank funds within the town also are owned by . While assigning a co-mayor is an automatic grant of usage to those funds, it is/should be assumed withdraws are for town-use only. Withdraw of town funds for personal use(embezzlement) is clearly abuse, and illegal(theft). That warrants a removal from co-mayor in the lightest sense, to a ban in the harshest.

Which means you can react to these situations, and resolve them in some fashion, if from theft then with a refund perhaps. However with an issue of /t delete, you cannot get that back. There is no refund, there is no going back. There is no more.

This is why I think the /t delete is not an issue of logic, but of liability, practicality,

Crafty_fire

You can now set a Co-Mayor for your town! Co-Mayors have the same permissions as Mayors with the exception of /t delete.
Type /t rank add co-mayor
You can now set Recruiters for your town! Recruiters have the ability to use the /t add command.
Type /t rank add recruiter
DO YOU HAVE MORE IDEAS FOR RANKS? POST THEM HERE!
~ @Fuzzlr

How about /t set builder

Builders can break and build on any plots except ones which you do /plot set locked

It would be really use full when you are trying to hire people to build stuff for your town and you don't want to make them assistant or make it so everyone can build or break on it :D hope this helpsAnd also co head of nations who can do the same thing as the head but not /n delete ( this might be in already I haven't been on in a while so pls don't rage at me)

Skwisher

How about /t set builder
Builders can break and build on any plots except ones which you do /plot set locked
It would be really use full when you are trying to hire people to build stuff for your town and you don't want to make them assistant or make it so everyone can build or break on it :D hope this helpsAnd also co head of nations who can do the same thing as the head but not /n delete ( this might be in already I haven't been on in a while so pls don't rage at me)
~ @Crafty_fire

+1, Also, maybe also make it that the builders can be part of another town as sometimes, people have to quit their town to do a building job in another town and then rejoin their main town, which can become a hassle especially if the builder has a high rank in their main town.

Crafty_fire

+1, Also, maybe also make it that the builders can be part of another town as sometimes, people have to quit their town to do a building job in another town and then rejoin their main town, which can become a hassle especially if the builder has a high rank in their main town.
~ @Skwisher

Good idea it would let builders do their job easily as well as make towns look betterMaybe even use a small version of world edit to terraform easier cuz it can take hours breaking a skyscraper

Squid53214

I think recruiters should also have the ability to put plots up for sale. What's the point of recruiting a player if you can't give them a place to stay?

Crafty_fire

I think recruiters should also have the ability to put plots up for sale. What's the point of recruiting a player if you can't give them a place to stay?
~ @Squid53214

Because if their allowed to put plots up for sale they could put the owners house for sale....

All you have to do is just keep a number of plots for sale and it will be fine

Squid53214

Because if their allowed to put plots up for sale they could put the owners house for sale....
All you have to do is just keep a number of plots for sale and it will be fine
~ @Crafty_fire

Maybe they could change it so that recruiters can only put un-owned plots for sale?

Crafty_fire

Maybe they could change it so that recruiters can only put un-owned plots for sale?
~ @Squid53214

I mean I guess but their called 'recruiters' not estate agents. anyway Towny needs lots of types of profession so they should make a profession that can dig away land (diggers) a profession that recruits (I know recruiters are already added in), estate agents which can put unowned plots fr sale ,and builders which build the houses which the owner sets a certain command to which only let's the builders build on the plots which that certain command is set. Cause whenever I make a town I kinda do all those things which gets slow and irritating and boring.different professions would be EXTREMELY useful for example /t set prof builder or /t set prof digger etc etcNow also I wouldn't trust ANY co mayor with /t withdraw its like giving a grenade to a 5 year old its an explosion waiting to happen because if you get mad with the co mayor he wouldn't do /t delete even if he could.on the other hand I know if you let anyone even your most trusted friends have co mayor THEY WILL do /t withdraw at one point or another for their own needs. Pls fuzzlr get rid of the ability for co mayors to do /t withdraw.Or let the mayor decide for example /t perms co-mayor withdraw (off or on)

« Previous Page Next Page »