Denied RuSiaN_PeDoBeaR's sexy appeal

I did not ignite the tnt and I didnt want it to ignite

 

Lets talk about placing tnt on the plot that you admitted to placing fire to burn down a building. Although firespread might not have been on, it is not necessary for explosions. You can simply light the tnt itself and it will blow up. Being the experienced player that you are, im sure you know that. In the meantime, why are there no other fire-placements within the same timeframe with the tnt-placements other than the ones made by yourself?

 

I didnt put the fire to ignite the tnt, I put the fire to make the building look on fire.

 

The ban reason was changed.

 

I know

 

Couldnt you say "the ban reason was changed" ._.''
I was happy for a second

 

Not trying to be rude, bu how did you get confused?

 

After me investigating a bit myself and reviewing the evidence, I have decided to deny this appeal. You, being a very, very, active and experienced player knew what you were walking in to, even if you just placed the tnt. The evidence is very substantial. You might try appealing again in 2 weeks.