Accepted Wth

Ign: w1111am
banned for scamming
length 7 days
I asked him to provide proof and he ends up banning me over a miscommunication, wth! If I ask to see a screeny he can straight up ban me?

 

The proof is here.

 

And after I requested him to post proof on forums then I would pay

 

Can you provide evidence of you saying that?

 

check my mail and ask sackboy000

 

Wait shouldn't I get a refund and an unban

--- Double Post Merged, Aug 3, 2014, Original Post Date: Aug 3, 2014 ---

And there wasn't proper and I was wrongly banned, thanks too bad moderating

 

You can tell in the last screenshot that you both accepted that the score was 3-1 and sackboy's way.

 

Doesn't matter, proof

 

That's what it shows w1111am. This is full proof, any explanation for not paying?

 

It doesn't, look!

 

I did look, there's proof bud.

 

Where does it show the last roll! Common staff this isn't legitimatelegitimate

--- Double Post Merged, Aug 3, 2014, Original Post Date: Aug 3, 2014 ---

It doesn't show all the roles, come on look?!

 

I'm going to let higher up staff take control of this.

 

Alright so there is Proof of you saying up to 3 for dicing But then u said up to 5 when you lost.

Here u said to 3.


And here u said it was to 5


Once again. This is Proof that u were trying to get of the 4 mill bet

 

Not trying to be rude but are you blind? It doesn't have all the proof necessary, I will even bend over to redo the dice just please see it through

 

No, I'm not You were trying to back out a dice duel that u said it was to 3 He won and you were tying to get it retstarted or to 5

 

No there is enough evidence to suggest it is 2-1 to him, please...

 

There is enough evidence.

You placed the rules then tried to back out of this.

 

There is not enough evidence I didn't back out we had a miscommunication, you can't ban if there is not enough proof dang it! Also saying their is enough evidence when there clearly isn't is not right. and notice how there i didn't mention I lost? He probably thought it was best of 3

--- Double Post Merged, Aug 3, 2014, Original Post Date: Aug 3, 2014 ---

I want this to be resolved quickly there clearly isn't enough proof and your arguments aren't valid

--- Double Post Merged, Aug 3, 2014 ---

Also you removed my discussion specs use I wanted the communities input, thanksthanks

 

W1111am since he has posted the proof of you dicing him. Also you just stated that after the proof was posted you would pay so I will give you one day to pay.