Decisions

I think that we should have a voting system so whenever staff decide to implement or take out something from the server we should have a community vote. But the "community" would only be people that the new feature would affect. Like if you wanted to add a new towny thing the voters would all be mayors and co-mayors of towns, or if you wanted to change terrarim you ask people that take the terrarium seriously for competitive pvp. Just ask people that know the subject. This would help all the complaints people have whenever something is added or takin out because you would have people who have knowledge on that certain subject decide if its good or bad. Because im tired of staff making all of these discussions on things they know nothing about.

Thank ya very much <3

 

I agree, but staff decided to listen to the cits who were jealous instead of the people with the actual rank.

 

True true

 

Thanks for saying that we know nothing about the server when 90% of what we do involves having to know a lot about the server. It's nice to know how much what we do and what we discuss is appreciated, and it's also nice to know that you guys know everything about everyone in staff as well as know everything that goes on in staff chats. I'm glad that you feel that you know better about everything and that you have no bias whatsoever, because it means we can just sit back and relax as you make all the decisions!

//sarcasm.

In all seriousness, we can't just do poll on the forums as not everyone goes on them, and surveys are hard to do in game. How do you suggest that we implement this in a way that is fair to everyone?

Also, your points don't make much sense. Towny changes effect everyone who plays towny. How are we supposed to know who is serious about terrarium and who is not?

 

Put t this way, y'all go off of the majority of,what people say. The majority of the server are cits. Some want more perks, but that's cause they are about to donate. If they know they will never donate (#4everacit @CottonSheep & @jipdos2) then they want the donators to have the least amount of perks possible. Therefore the majority says "Yes, remove it".

 

Shouldn't they go off of the majority? They make up most of the server population.

 

Here's what I say, they should separate the non donators and the donators. Then take a poll from both sides. And then merge the two results into a mean and see what that is. (That may be the dumbest thing use ever heard, I hope I did that math right)

 

Exactly my point, you don't know who is serious about pvp and who's not if you were in this community you would. I've never seen you in terrarium before, I've never seen you In god gear and I've never heard your name mentioned in PvP so you obviously do not understand how this PvP community on meep works. Im saying staff DO know all the technical stuff about meep, not necessarily mc. Yes staff all have their categories in which they exceed knowledge in but they don't know everything. I would rather have some citizen that PvPs make the terrarium calls vs you who is a mod but has little knowledge of this topic.

 

Preach it baby, preach it.

 

We understand the difference between citizens and donators. You are complaining about one thing that happened, which is donator kits being removed, and that is going to be remedied with a meeble multiplier for donators. We do not just listen to citizens when it comes to making changes; we perfectly understand just how much perks mean to donators.

I've never worked on PvP things purely because I know little about it (serious pvp, that is). I never said that I personally worked on the PvP, but you are assuming that every staff member is completely ignorant of everything to do with PvP, which is 100% incorrect.

My point was that we can't just use the opinions of those who we see frequent the terrarium; plenty of people pvp that we don't see often. Are we supposed to disregard their opinions? If not, how are we supposed to deduce who is serious about pvp and who is not?

 

find a staff member who is familiar with a certain topic and have them create a list of people that should be in that voting party. Like for pvp it should be @Foretvert

 

Denied