-1
Your attititude makes me feel physically ill and since you have provided no feasible logic to warrant this implementation, I see no reason to support it. Rather than explaning and evaluating an opinion or idea, you are stating the designated idea and then rebuking any attempt to reason with you by classifying all those who disagree as lesser beings.
I don't know if you ever learned this in school, but the key attributes of a functional and reasonable marketting move (or any proposition to a third party audience) are the Point Evidence Explain narrative. Just mentioning this term gives me crazy nostalgia since this is grade 4 stuff, however for the sake of progress, I will elaborate.
Point
The first step, and the only one that you tend to focus on (not just in this thread but every proposition that I have come across from you) is the most obvious: stating what you want.
Evidence
For any reasonable argument to be made, sufficient evidence of the proposition being beneficial to the system must be provided. This could include standard metric data, surveys, reports, etc. I would elaborate on the concepts of accuracy and precision, but that would spiral off into a seperate topic.
Explain
Probably (in my opinion) the most crucial step, I would argue it to be even more important than the first step, since a movement without reason is simply a statement. You must elaborate and explain why your proposition should be implemented, utilizing the evidence supplied in the previous stage to back up each of the points made and thoroughly diagnose the context under which the suggestion would be utilized, i.e. in order to make a valid argument about voting being changed, sufficient investigation and accurate evidence must be included.
I do hope that even if your arrogance refuses to acknowledge your own impudence and fatuity, that you may learn something from this and proceed to develop your mental cognitivity as well as improve your communication skills.
- J055Y_
