Whatever the case, I'm sure the mods won't do anything about this. I don't see a point in wasting my time anymore, I have schoolwork I need to do.
Explain to me how he lured him. Please.
~ @reggles44
Let's say the Ult said "come check my build" and tpa's yaboi7 to him. yaboi77 dies. The Ult said "check my build" so he killed another player under false pretenses. Luring. Now, you voted the rules don't need changing. By the current definitions, yaboi77 was killed by another player under false pretenses. Objectively Luring. (rip pretty much all ults)
So the mods will most likely ignore this because it isn't their problem or someone causing a ruckus in /g. It's up to the Ult to give the other player back their items and nobody cares. That's the way things work. But it doesn't always work out.
Here's a similar situation:
BaTaReIka_LoVe was this really annoying player who was on recently. She kept evading the censor, using b's and q's as g's if you know what I mean. I didn't care, I thought the mods would fire the ban hammer. They didn't. I wanted to see her in /L and maybe talk to adrian so I tpa'd to her. I had to resend cause she tp'd and I thought it was the anticheat bugging (like it usually does) so I resent. I went to the restroom, and came back to a death message. She tpa'd me to an ocean while I was afk. So... false pretenses, player killed, (albeit intentionally this time) and of course, no action despite a modreq. Luring? by the current definition, yes.
But does it matter what the rules say if the moderators don't enforce them? The mods NEVER help with luring in my experience, and so I believe any change, and consequentially, this thread, are mundane.
Sidenote: I am not trying to bash the mods or make trouble with Reggles. I see it's an area in which the server could improve. Why let a good server stay good? Meep can be great if we work together to solve problems like this.
