I'm stating my opinion, it's not like I'm accepting /denying it. stop criticising me so harshly. I'm just saying, people who do caps any way for no reason will find a way to be a nuisance yet still go under the guidelines of acceptable. I'm not saying this isn't a bad idea, it will help in cases. but I feel there are some people who will ruin the perk for us all,
~ @Vexmae
The reason I'm critcizing you so harshly is because your opinion makes no sense at all. When people express their opinions, often times they say why they like it, especially when they're replying to threads about amending a rule. Your point makes no sense, you have no backing to it and refuse to respond to my points that challenge them.
This time, I'm going to ask you to defend yourself here.
Can you explain to me how giving three letter caps a nuisance? Almost all three letter words that will be capitalized are acronyms, and the mass consensus of this thread says that saying "L O L" (which we do nowadays) instead of just saying "LOL" is more annoying. If I wanted to be a nuisance, I could just bypass the chat filter, which actually just makes my all caps phrase more annoying.
Can you explain to me why giving people the option to capitalize two extra letters in a word will lead to more abuse? If someone wants to spam a particular phrase, they'll find a method to do it whether theres a 3 letter caps filter or not. If I wanted to spam a phrase, do you seriously think an easy to circumnavigate chat filter will stop me? Do you seriously think that adding a 3 letter caps system, something a vast majority of people want, will allow me to say a phrase I could not do with this current chat filter?
Can you explain to me how theres no need for quality of life improvements on Meepcraft? There is a way to say three letter acronyms on the server already, but isn't worth it to make people happier by changing the rule to accommodate three letter phrases? We've just established that the rule is redundant, and everyone on this thread so far wants the change. Im so harsh about this point because it makes you seem like you're going out of your way to defend staffs decision just because its staffs decision, you can't even explain why you want things to change the way they are using real, valid points.